On MSNBC Politics Nation with Al Sharpton, Hiram College professor Jason Johnson and Joan Walsh of Salon.com discuss the prospect of a new government shutdown over President Barack Obama’s anticipated executive action on immigration.
2014 Election
MSNBC: Jason Johnson and Michelle Cottle Discuss Obamacare Repeal with Rev. Al Sharpton
On MSNBC’s Politics Nation with Al Sharpton, Hiram College professor Jason Johnson and Michelle Cottle of National Journal discuss the possible repeal of the Affordable Care Act in the next Congress.
Why Obama Needs Loretta Lynch
Mario Puzo’s generation-spanning opus provides a great allegory for considering the selection of a US Attorney General. In the Godfather films, the consigliere is the mob family lawyer-they handle the dirty business, the laws, the cops, the judges to keep the family clean, and protect the organization as a whole. Different times call for different consiglieres and the same goes for the selection of an AG. Sometimes you need a simple attorney one who will prosecute basic cases and counsel the president; other times you need your attorney general to be your anger translator, pushing forth the agenda the president wants but can’t admit to the public. And other times, as Michael Corleone once famously said – you need a “wartime consigliere” who will go into legal battle with you, and help you hide the proverbial bodies when the smoke finally settles. Don’t let the smooth taste fool you, President Obama just picked a wartime consigliere in Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and that speaks volumes about what he plans to do in the final two years of his presidency.
If you look at the last several attorney general selections by US presidents, they were chosen with a specific purpose in mind. When Bill Clinton picked Janet Reno in 1993, it was a historic first to select a woman for that position. It was also no coincidence that a president who had a history of extramarital affairs and sexual harassment would pick a woman attorney to defend him, especially one with a history of aggressive behavior in sex crimes cases. When George W. Bush picked John Ashcroft, he had a straight-laced legal eagle who fought against school desegregation and viewed law and order above civil liberties. That was great when crafting the Patriot Act, but when it became time to prosecute the War on Terror, Bush picked Alberto Gonzalez, a man who had no problem twisting the Constitution to justify torture. In other words, every president picks their attorney general with a long-term political agenda in mind. What is Obama’s plan based on Lynch’s professional history? He needs an attorney to protect him against serious investigations and hearings into corruption.
Lynch made her career as a prosecutor in New York, specializing in taking on corrupt politicians and dirty cops. In a city where both are bountiful, this is still a pretty tough way to make your career. While her most famous case in the minds of most African Americans would be her successful prosecution of Justin Volpe–one of the New York cops who sexually assaulted Abner Louima–it is her prosecution of politicians, both Democratic and Republican that probably caught the eye of President Obama. He knew long before last Tuesday that Republicans were likely to take over the U.S. Senate land and with an even more hostile Congress coming over the horizon, investigations were to be forthcoming. And like clockwork, within hours of the GOP super tsunami of 2014 Ted Cruz (R – TX) stated that the first priority of the new Republican led Senate would be a series of hearings about the ‘lawless’ nature of the Obama administration, in addition to investigations into Benghazi, the IRS, “Fast and Furious” and other ‘scandals.’
President Obama needs an attorney general who knows how to take down a politician inside and out, and Lynch is the perfect choice. Having dismantled powerful political leaders, even Democrats in deep blue New York, Lynch can give Obama the strategies he needs to every type of attack that’s coming, and they will definitely be coming. Eric Holder’s Justice Department dumped over 64,000 pages of previously unreleased documents to Republicans in Congress the day before the Midterm elections. Holder had been ignoring GOP Congressional requests for these documents for months, so this was a sort-of peace offering before the slaughter, but also done in clear recognition that the Republicans plan on hemming up the final two years of the Obama presidency with investigations to embarrass him and tar Hillary Clinton. Lynch will start with Obama’s plan on that case and likely be focused on others before too long.
The Republicans in Congress will put up a fight against Loretta Lynch in this lame duck session, asking her to account for things that her predecessor did and challenging her to bend to their will in the coming Congress. Already the right wing press has attempted to smear her reputation with sadly amusing but not surprising results. In the end however, she’ll get through, and the president will sit down with her over the holidays and get ready to do battle. President Obama has had to fight his whole presidency just for the basic right to succeed or fail just like any president before him. With this selection he appears to be taking that fight to the Republicans, and we’ll have two years to find out who wins.
This article originally appeared online at Ebony.com.
Ebony: Now WHAT? The Who, What, Where and Why of 2014’s Midterm Meltdown
I am sure that President Barack Obama hoped that the worst news he’d get last week was Michael Jordan’s assessment of his golf game, but being president is seldom that easy. The president and the Democratic Party suffered astounding losses in Tuesday’s Midterm elections and he is taking the brunt of the blame. There is no silver lining to what occurred in the 2014 midterms, and if you’re a Democrat, the shining light you think see at the end of the tunnel is probably a freight train. But as the weeks of hand wringing and finger pointing and political shade throwing commence, it might be important to understand exactly what really happened and what it means for African Americans politically in the next two years.
About Last (Tuesday) Night
Republicans won eight seats in the Senate and possibly more by the time runoffs and vote counting are finished. They also managed to hold onto governor’s mansions in Wisconsin, Florida and Kansas, despite extremely unpopular incumbents. But probably the most important result of the elections occurred on the State House level, where Republicans now control the largest number of state legislatures since the Eisenhower administration. The significance of this can’t be understated. State legislatures are responsible for carving out voting districts, state legislatures are responsible for passing and implementing voter ID laws, determining if Medicaid expansion occurs, school funding and housing rights. In other words: local policies have a lot more to do with the day to day lives of African Americans than our mostly do-nothing Congress and those states just turned beet red. Political science research, history and common sense can explain why Democrats lost so many seats in the Senate and gave up even more ground in the House of Representatives but the governor’s mansions and state legislatures were a bit of a surprise to most pundits and analysts who’d been watching the numbers for weeks.
These Polls Ain’t Loyal
Part of the surprise from the 2014 Midterms is due to the fact that this year featured some of the worst and most unreliable polling we’ve seen in an American election in almost a decade. Pollsters blew it in the 2008 presidential election by radically underestimating African American turnout. Since then, more polling agencies like the Pew and YouGov realized that over 75% of African Americans under the age of 30 are cell phone only, which means older polling methods dependent on landlines or area codes to determine voting behavior will miss a large chunk of voters. The counting and estimates of African American voting and voting behavior in general have improved steadily each election cycle until Tuesday’s complete flop. Most pollsters predicted anemic turnout by Black voters, but bad showing for Democrats in key races like North Carolina and Georgia wasn’t due to African Americans, who turned out at levels similar to 2010 and sometimes a little higher, despite grotesque voter suppression tactics. It was White democrats who dropped the ball in the South, with turnouts dropping anywhere from 7 to 12% in some states. This turned “safe” races into nail biters and doomed candidates like Kay Hagan in North Carolina and Mark Pryor of Arkansas. On the flip side, the Maryland governor’s race, which no one was paying attention to, had a White Republican beating an African American Democrat due to low Black turnout, and African Americans voting Republican after seeing ads like this. In other words, nobody seemed to have any idea what Black voters were going to do until the last minute, and it cost Obama and the Democrats dearly.
Say My Name, Say My Name
President Obama took a tremendous amount of pride in saying that while his name was not on the ballot, his policies were. Some Democratic analysts went crazy, begging Obama to stay in Washington and not gin up Republican opposition. Despite the lowest unemployment rate in 6 years, Wall-street sitting pretty and gas prices so low Fahvergnugen is back in style Democrats couldn’t run away from Obama and his policies fast enough. Kentucky Democratic candidate Allison Lundegren Grimes denied voting for Obama 4 times. Hell, Peter only did it thrice. Ironically it was Gary Peters a Democrat running for an open seat in Michigan who embraced President Obama’s policies and he won his race. Which stands to reason, from a policy standpoint many of President Obama’s policies remain popular. It’s Obama that a large number of voters, especially the over 60 White and male voters who made up over 37% of the midterm electorate, that people have a problem with. How else can you explain Red state voters in Nebraska, South Dakota and Arkansas voting to increase the minimum wage (one of Obama’s signature issues since 2012), and at the same time voting in Senate and gubernatorial candidates who have stood firmly against minimum wage increases. Or red states like Kentucky and West Virginia seeing huge drops in the number of uninsured but still voting for Senators who want to repeal Obamacare. As Mary Landrieu (D – LA for now) stated plainly, President Obama’s unmistakable Blackness was always going to be a stumbling block in these Southern red states, despite the hypocritical embrace of many of his policies.
Optimistic Obama
The only people who can be truly happy about the 2014 Midterms are Republicans, Pro-Lifers, Vote suppressors and free market capitalists, groups mind you, that don’t necessarily overlap. Yep President Obama was quite comfortable during his post-election press conference, a radical departure from his sad Charlie Brown act after the 2010 midterms. This probably reflects the fact that Obama knows the big picture of these past elections. Congressional approval has been at a historic low of 15% for almost two years. To put that in perspective, amongst Americans Vladimir Putin has an approval rating of 9% and North Korea has an approval rating of 11%. Congressionally, last night was less an embrace of the Republican agenda, which clearly most voters don’t approve of, as much as it was a political temper tantrum against a Congress and government that never seems to be doing any actual governing. When Rush Limbaugh admits that Republicans are being sent to Congress to “Stop Obama” and not govern the president knows what’s up. Washington isn’t broken, it’s just filled with a Congress that would rather see the nation go to hell in a handbasket than let THIS president (because he’s a Democrat, or because he’s Black, or because he’s too aloof, choose your excuse) take credit for anything. Expect the president to continue to push through judges that will protect civil rights, continue investigations into Ferguson and Florida and continue his spotty record with HBCUs.
African Americans will have to scrape together local constituencies and coalitions and slog out fights in order to get anything done. Eventually this anti-Obama fever will break, and some presidential candidate who isn’t Black, will tout the same policies as Obama but will somehow be deemed more palatable to a certain segment of swing voters and members of Congress. Because in the end, this election showed us that President Obama’s policies aren’t really the problem, for many midterm voters, they just don’t like who’s delivering them.
This article originally appeared online at Ebony.com.
CNN: Jason Johnson on Jeb Bush for President 2016
On CNN @ This Hour, Hiram College professor Jason Johnson and Margaret Hoover discuss President Barack Obama at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit and the possible presidential candidacy of Jeb Bush in 2016.
